> In other > cases we update system time after each of those "runs" which, I believe, > won't be many times. Does this seem reasonable? If so, I'd like to push > those patches (properly squashed). Maybe I could add some > better-explaining comment to the code. Okay, I follow you now. This does sound reasonable. I think additional comments would help, yes. > The other thing is that we should update the *HW clock* only when the > user gets after the "point of no return" so that it is preserved in case > that installation fails before this point (don't know how this was > handled in the old code). We'll either do this in the execute method of Timezone in kickstart.py (if there's no such class yet, we'll add one) or in the proposed doInstall method I'm working on here. That's not working yet, which is why you haven't seen it. - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
