On 3/20/12 8:16 AM, Martin Gracik wrote: > I looked at the package for f17 and these files are not moved, I'll ask the maintainer Ok, it's interesting that the /usr move process didn't file bugs against packages with files in /sbin, or otherwise reference the requirement to get stuff moved in various packages. I see that the packaging specs are updated, though; still, over 500 files are deposited in /sbin alone in the rawhide package set. Sigh. I guess it should have been obvious. :) Anyway, xfsprogs doesn't look like the only one that might break this when it's updated: removefrom audit /etc/* /sbin/audispd /sbin/auditctl /sbin/aureport removefrom audit /sbin/ausearch /sbin/autrace /usr/bin/* removefrom btrfs-progs /sbin/btrfs-* /sbin/btrfstune removefrom device-mapper-multipath /etc/* /sbin/mpathconf /sbin/multipathd removefrom dosfstools /sbin/dosfsck /sbin/fsck.* removefrom glibc /${libdir}/libthread* /${libdir}/rtkaio* /sbin/* removefrom grub2 /sbin/* /usr/bin/* removefrom iproute /etc/* /sbin/cbq /sbin/ifcfg /sbin/rtmon /sbin/tc /usr/* removefrom jfsutils /sbin/jfs_fsck /sbin/jfs_fscklog /sbin/jfs_logdump removefrom jfsutils /sbin/jfs_mkfs I'll probably update xfsprogs in rawhide, do you need a heads up when I do? Or could these be changed to a regexp that would catch either location? -Eric > ----- Original Message ----- >>> I'm curious for how long this will work with /usr move stuff. >> >> Yeah, me too. >> >> - Chris >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list >> Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list >> > > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list