This is the new version of patches resolving rhbz#744129. Few comments: 1.) As it can be seen on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744129 I haven't been able to get the info about the upper bound. So I've tested 128 GB swap on x86 architecture (which should be the most limitting one) and it worked. I think this value should be ok for users. If somebody wants bigger swap than 128 GB in future, we can modify the constant after doing some more tests. But I think it's not necessary now. 2.) I know using a constant in storage/formats/swap.py//Swap._maxSize is not ideal, but the other option was to import storage.formats.swap to iutil.py where this value is also needed in swapSameAsRam function. Since I think about iutil.py as a set of utility functions on the lowest level I didn't want to make it dependent on storage. 3.) Should these go also to master and f17-branch? -- Vratislav Podzimek _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
