Re: [f17-branch master] Be more verbose about upgrade failures (#735060)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:42:03AM +0100, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> Ack, but see a comment below.
> 
> > -            if upgradeany or \
> > -               anaconda.instClass.productUpgradable(arch, product, version):
> > +            upgradable = anaconda.instClass.productUpgradable(arch, product, version)
> What about: 
> (upgradable, tests) = anaconda.instClass.productUpgradable(arch...)?
> Or without brackets. Since both items from the tuple are used I think we
> could improve readability.

Good suggestion, thanks!

-- 
Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT)

Attachment: pgpY2oNJkR9IK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux