DASD devices lack descriptions somewhere in the code! Mainframe users
are completely lost without this patch. Really, won't someone think of
the mainframe users. Once they trigger this code in the installer, we
are EXPECTING them to know what 'dasd' stands for, so better to expand
that extremely confusing acronym to the more sane looking 'DASD'. How
dare we. How _dare_ we.
@@ -, +, @@
pyanaconda/platform.py | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
--- a/pyanaconda/platform.py
+++ a/pyanaconda/platform.py
@@ -264,6 +264,11 @@ class S390(Platform):
_packages = ["s390utils"]
_disklabel_types = ["msdos", "dasd"]
_boot_stage1_device_types = ["disk", "partition"]
+ _boot_dasd_description = N_("DASD")
+ _boot_zfcp_description = N_("zFCP")
+ _boot_descriptions = {"dasd": _boot_dasd_description,
+ "zfcp": _boot_zfcp_description,
+ "partition":
Platform._boot_partition_description}
def __init__(self, anaconda):
Platform.__init__(self, anaconda)
--
David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Supervisor, Installer Engineering Team
Red Hat, Inc. | Westford, MA | EST5EDT
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
