> From what I know, we have two kind of anaconda tests inside AutoQA: > 1. older rats_install test written by Will Woods and executed James > Laska in the past > 2. newer anaconda_storage, anaconda_checkbot and compose_tree written > by Chris Lumens and James Laska > > I am not sure which of those tests provide important feedback to the > anaconda team and whether they are being used at all. Can relevant > people provide more details about it? I'm currently not checking the results of any tests, but I would like to. Can I get emailed on just the results of the anaconda tests? Of the ones in (2), checkbot is likely the most important, though it may also be failing at the moment due to transifex. Storage could potentially be very handy. > Anaconda team, do you have some specific questions about AutoQA > integration and the UI re-write? Will you want to change your tests > inside AutoQA in response the new UI and need to have some information > from us? I'll happy to answer them if I can. The storage test will potentially need changes since I'm working on removing the interface requirement from storage probing. I don't know if we are going to have specific extra I don't have any testing-related questions at the moment, but that's largely because I have no idea how to even get started making sure this UI is easily testable. If you have any pointers, I'd be happy to consider them. I'm only going to write a new UI once, so we should make sure it's testable. - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
