Re: Proposal to move install classes info to repository

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,


> An errata to change the product composition? That seems weird - we
> don't do
> that now.

This has to be discussed with release engineering then.


> > I am not exactly following here. This is not replacing comps
> > groups,
> > install data only select the groups and the kickstart will do much
> > the same
> > we do now: Select the default setup for installation.
> 
> But we don't have a single default install class. We have multiple
> (or no)
> defaults - we have a KDE desktop spin, a GNOME spin, etc. - each of
> these
> have different defaults. For that other product, we have multiple
> install
> classes, all of which has different default groups and parameters.

We do not do anything like this now either.. Right now anaconda uses default comps. So yes, I was thinking that in this regard each product has it's own repository.


And regarding code to explode package. We already have it in place, I use it for driverdisc features.

Martin

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list


[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux