On 09/29/2011 02:03 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Peter Jones (pjones@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
Anaconda selects these if we're on an appropriate system, so don't pull
them in by default.
Are they required somewhere appropriately that they'll get pulled into a
compose if they fall out of comps?
Hrm. Probably not. Should I leave them in but put the type as something
other than default, instead of this?
Bill
---
comps-f16.xml.in | 2 --
comps-f17.xml.in | 2 --
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/comps-f16.xml.in b/comps-f16.xml.in
index be87539..819a907 100644
--- a/comps-f16.xml.in
+++ b/comps-f16.xml.in
@@ -756,8 +756,6 @@
<packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq>
-<packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq>
-<packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq>
diff --git a/comps-f17.xml.in b/comps-f17.xml.in
index 267fafa..fe3fa63 100644
--- a/comps-f17.xml.in
+++ b/comps-f17.xml.in
@@ -691,8 +691,6 @@
<packagereq type="mandatory">util-linux</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">vim-minimal</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">yum</packagereq>
-<packagereq type="default">efibootmgr</packagereq>
-<packagereq type="default">grub2</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">ppc64-utils</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">s390utils</packagereq>
<packagereq type="default">sendmail</packagereq>
--
1.7.6
--
Peter
What we need is either less corruption, or more chances to
participate in it.
01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
