--- a/pyanaconda/iw/upgrade_bootloader_gui.py +++ b/pyanaconda/iw/upgrade_bootloader_gui.py @@ -43,12 +43,11 @@ class UpgradeBootloaderWindow (InstallWindow): self.dispatch.skipStep("bootloader") self.dispatch.skipStep("instbootloader") elif self.newbl_radio.get_active(): - self.dispatch.skipStep("bootloader", skip = 0) - self.dispatch.skipStep("instbootloader", skip = 0) + self.dispatch.request_step("bootloader")Shouldn't there also be: self.dispatch.request_step("instbootloader")
No, I was looking at how those steps interact and it is the bootloader step that decides to request or skip instbootloader (which sounds logical to me). This is the exact situation that would cause a DispatchError (trying to skip step that was requested).
Unfortunately it means the mapping is not 1:1 from the old functions but that's the cost of making the API stricter and providing more guarantees.
Ales _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
