Hi, I'm not sure this is a good idea. I'm getting a bit rusty wrt RAID things now, but IIRC, we need to write out an mdadm.conf with "AUTO +imsm +1.x -all" In there, even on a system without any arrays, to ensure that any Intel BIOS RAID arrays which are created on a system (from the BIOS) post install, will get properly activated. All in all my 2 cents are that this fix is a bit risky this late in the cycle. Esp. when there is a much easier low risk fix 696907 available in the form of making initscripts check that /sbin/mdadm exists before trying to execute it. TBH I don't see how this is an anaconda bug at all. Regards, Hans On 04/15/2011 05:12 PM, Chris Lumens wrote:
--- pyanaconda/storage/__init__.py | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/pyanaconda/storage/__init__.py b/pyanaconda/storage/__init__.py index 825da11..6d0933d 100644 --- a/pyanaconda/storage/__init__.py +++ b/pyanaconda/storage/__init__.py @@ -2313,6 +2313,8 @@ class FSSet(object): # assemble the whole stack in one go unless listed in the proper order # in mdadm.conf arrays.sort(key=lambda d: d.path) + if not arrays: + return "" conf = "# mdadm.conf written out by anaconda\n" conf += "MAILADDR root\n"
_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list