Hi,
I'm not sure this is a good idea. I'm getting a bit rusty wrt
RAID things now, but IIRC, we need to write out an mdadm.conf with
"AUTO +imsm +1.x -all"
In there, even on a system without any arrays, to ensure that any
Intel BIOS RAID arrays which are created on a system (from the BIOS)
post install, will get properly activated.
All in all my 2 cents are that this fix is a bit risky this late
in the cycle. Esp. when there is a much easier low risk fix 696907
available in the form of making initscripts check that /sbin/mdadm
exists before trying to execute it.
TBH I don't see how this is an anaconda bug at all.
Regards,
Hans
On 04/15/2011 05:12 PM, Chris Lumens wrote:
---
pyanaconda/storage/__init__.py | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pyanaconda/storage/__init__.py b/pyanaconda/storage/__init__.py
index 825da11..6d0933d 100644
--- a/pyanaconda/storage/__init__.py
+++ b/pyanaconda/storage/__init__.py
@@ -2313,6 +2313,8 @@ class FSSet(object):
# assemble the whole stack in one go unless listed in the proper order
# in mdadm.conf
arrays.sort(key=lambda d: d.path)
+ if not arrays:
+ return ""
conf = "# mdadm.conf written out by anaconda\n"
conf += "MAILADDR root\n"
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
