On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 11:19 -0400, Chris Lumens wrote: > > Adding a [gpgkeys] section to .treeinfo is interesting. As you point > > out, it could be used by anaconda to install the keys during > > installation. However, I don't know that anaconda itself should be > > responsible for adding the section to .treeinfo. That belongs somewhere > > in pungi. > > Well, lorax would be responsible now - that's where the logic of > scripts/maketreeinfo.py has gone. > > But, why would anaconda need to look up which keys to import from the > .treeinfo? Wouldn't we just want to see what got dropped into /etc/pki > during tree composition?' To be honest, I haven't given it much thought. However, it feels like explicitly listing the keys is safer than doing a glob on a directory. > > - Chris > > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
