Chris Lumens <clumens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think that even a nicer arrangement would be having an extra > > package to do the builds. So the responsibilities are: > > > > anaconda -- just the installer > > lorax -- the generic tool for building bootable images > > the new package (e.g. anaconda-compose) -- set of templates as an > > input for lorax that produce the final image. > > This reminds me an awful lot of the anaconda-images or anaconda-runtime > packages we used to have. I guess everything old is new again. It does, but I think it makes sense to have the templates in their own package so we don't have to rebuild lorax when the image needs to change. But making anaconda-compose or a similar package doesn't seem right. Any reason these cannot become part of fedora-release? Or another package that already exists and contains distribution-specific configuration files? -- David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> Supervisor, Installer Engineering Team Red Hat, Inc. | Honolulu, HI | UTC-10 _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
