On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 08:50 +0100, Martin Gracik wrote: > On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 16:38 -0500, Will Woods wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 03:22 -0500, Martin Gracik wrote: > > > Why do you want to remove the gzip python module calls, and replace them with an external call to gzip? > > > > Mostly just for consistency with the other compressor call - plus it let > > me remove an 'import' and a few lines of code, plus it would make it > > easier to replace gzip with another compression program like xz. Except > > module-init-tools only supports .gz files. So.. yeah. Not that useful. > > > > I'll send a much smaller patch that just does the xz compression. > > > > -w > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list > > I tried to use python modules if we have them instead of calling some > binaries. I hope there will be the PyLZMA module in fedora soon, so we > can change the xz call in the future too. > > I have the lzma code in my local branch, I was trying it before we went > to Tempe, so you don't need to bother with it. > > But, does it require any changes in anaconda? Or can we push the patch > to the repo and start using lzma right away? > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=10571 there's pyliblzma, is that gonna work? -sv _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
