On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 16:29 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote: > > Weird. I could swear I tested this. Also, wow -- I mistakenly assumed > > all of anaconda's classes were new-style. > > AnacondaBackend is old, old stuff. > > > > You could also convert backend.py:doBackendSetup to just pass instead of > > > raise an error, and then get rid of this method entirely. I'd be fine > > > with that. > > > > There are at least eight of these that raise NotImplementedError. I like > > the idea of making them pass instead. > > The way I see it, if a method is strictly required to be implemented by > all backends, the abstract one should raise NIE. If it's not strictly > required, it should just pass. Agreed, but that's beyond the scope of this patch set. I'll handle it separately. New version of patch 7 sent to the list which does not try to use a property for self.osimg but instead accesses the data directly from self.anaconda.storage. Dave _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
