> Weird. I could swear I tested this. Also, wow -- I mistakenly assumed > all of anaconda's classes were new-style. AnacondaBackend is old, old stuff. > > You could also convert backend.py:doBackendSetup to just pass instead of > > raise an error, and then get rid of this method entirely. I'd be fine > > with that. > > There are at least eight of these that raise NotImplementedError. I like > the idea of making them pass instead. The way I see it, if a method is strictly required to be implemented by all backends, the abstract one should raise NIE. If it's not strictly required, it should just pass. > While I like that idea, further thought leads to the unfortunate detail > of rebuilding the fstype combo based on the current value of mountpoint, > which is distasteful at best. Yuck. - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
