Re: [PATCH 2/3] Display a warning message on TAINT_HARDWARE_UNSUPPORTED (#623140).

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 11:31 -0800, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:35 +0100, Martin Gracik wrote:
> 
> > Wouldn't it be better to convert the contents to int and compare to 0?
> > and I guess there's no need to ignore case when comparing something to
> > "0".
> 
> It is a good idea to convert to an int and then check against the actual
> taint bit. This is a set of bits, not just tainted hardware. A quick
> reading suggests that right now you'll treat all tainting equally. This
> might actually be desired in RHEL but just FYI not all values in that
> file are created equal.
> 
> (my suggestion is to go back to whatever BZ originally requested this,
> please ensure I'm on the CC, then ask what to actually test against).

Any followup?

Jon.


_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list


[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux