Re: [PATCH] Fix test for CTC devices from yesterday.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Radek Vykydal wrote:

On 11/03/2010 04:30 PM, Chris Lumens wrote:
---
  pyanaconda/isys/devices.c |    2 +-
  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pyanaconda/isys/devices.c b/pyanaconda/isys/devices.c
index 5d509c3..a30f006 100644
--- a/pyanaconda/isys/devices.c
+++ b/pyanaconda/isys/devices.c
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ storagedone:
              }

              /* S390 channel-to-channnel devices have type 256 */
- if (type != 1&& !strncmp(ent->d_name, "ctc", 3)&& type != 256)

Here all the expressions are and'ed.

Test 1:
    type = 1
    ent->d_name = "foo"

    type != 1                         FAIL
    !strncmp(ent->d_name, "ctc", 3)   FAIL
    type != 256                       PASS

    got FAIL && FAIL && PASS = FAIL

Test 2:
    type = 1
    end->d_name = "ctc"

    type != 1                         FAIL
    !strncmp(ent->d_name, "ctc", 3)   PASS
    type != 256                       PASS

    got FAIL && PASS && PASS = FAIL

Test 3:
    type = 2
    end->d_name = "ctc"

    type != 1                         PASS
    !strncmp(ent->d_name, "ctc", 3)   PASS
    type != 256                       PASS

    got PASS && PASS && PASS = PASS

+ if (type != 1 || (!strncmp(ent->d_name, "ctc", 3)&& type != 256))

Here the last two expressions are and'ed and that result is or'ed with the
first expression.

Test 1:
    type = 1
    ent->d_name = "foo"

    type != 1                         FAIL
    !strncmp(ent->d_name, "ctc", 3)   FAIL   \
                                              && FAIL
    type != 256                       PASS   /

    got FAIL || FAIL = FAIL

Test 2:
    type = 1
    end->d_name = "ctc"

    type != 1                         FAIL
    !strncmp(ent->d_name, "ctc", 3)   PASS   \
                                              && PASS
    type != 256                       PASS   /

    got FAIL || PASS = PASS

Test 3:
    type = 2
    end->d_name = "ctc"

    type != 1                         PASS
    !strncmp(ent->d_name, "ctc", 3)   PASS   \
                                              && PASS
    type != 256                       PASS   /

    got PASS || PASS = PASS


                  continue;

              new = calloc(1, sizeof(struct device));


I feel confused, but shouldn't the condition stand:

if ( type != 1 && !(!strncmp(ent->d_name, "ctc", 3) && type == 256) )

That is: ignore the same as before except for device that has type 256
and starts with "cnc"?

(original condition was: if (type != 1))

We went from FAIL, FAIL, PASS to FAIL, PASS, PASS with the addition of the
parens.  Without the patch, the code requires ctc devices to be type != 1 and
type != 256, when we really need to just check that type != 256 if we have a
ctc device.

--
David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Red Hat / Honolulu, HI

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list


[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux