Chris Lumens wrote: >> Yes - absolutely! Thank you! (Could it also briefly mention which >> version is used in an RHEL release?) > >That is a little more complicated, because a RHEL release doesn't >totally match up to a Fedora release. For instance, in RHEL6 we have an >F13-based anaconda but it's 13.21.80-something. A lot of changes have >gone in there since it branched off F13. > >So while my intention is that this will be useful for RHEL, I'm not sure >how to format everything to make that happen. I'd hate to have an >F13->F14 section, a F13->RHEL6 section, and a RHEL6->F14 section. Ah, that would make things more complicated, although I wouldn't think an RHEL6->F14 section would be particularly necessary. If RHEL and Fedora users generally stay in their own camps, perhaps you could have an RHEL5->RHEL6 section, with a footnote that it's F13-based. Or, if going back to RHEL5 is too complicated, start a line at RHEL6. Moray. "To err is human. To purr, feline" _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
