On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 15:23 -0400, R P Herrold wrote: > I use it and see and respond to reports of people using it > needing suptort getting it going [usually a bad export or > re-export on the images side] over in CentOS space. > Not technically Fedora, but stuff flows downhill, and if it > disappears upstream, and does NOT disappear later below, all > that one has done is forked a support load. As such, I > anticipate that a removal in F implies an intent for a removal > everywhere > That said, I can and will live without NFS-ISO so long as an > anon FTP based install remains possible What is the driver for considering its removal? Would single-port, NFSv4-only support reduce issues? -- Bryan J Smith Senior Consultant Red Hat, Inc Professional Consulting http://www.redhat.com/consulting mailto:bjs@xxxxxxxxxx +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile) mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx (Blackberry/Red Hat-External) -------------------------------------------------------- You already know Red Hat as the entity dedicated to 100% no-IP-strings-attached, community software development. But do you know where CIOs rate Red Hat versus other software and services firms for their own, direct needs, year after year? http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list