On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 16:04 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 05/21/2010 03:46 PM, Martin Gracik wrote: > > Yeah, sorting by size is a good idea, here's the list sorted by size, biggest first > > > > http://mgracik.fedorapeople.org/install_image_diff_by_size.txt > > > > About the qt, you're right, yum installs a lot of dependency stuff, which is not needed, > > removing these dependencies can make the install tree smaller too. > > > > We really should get rid of all the kde stuff in there, that will help a lot. Also > you can start with adding /var/lib/rpm to your to remove stuff, we really don't > need an rpm database under the installer environment. > > So your first point of business is (IMHO) to track down why kde is getting dragged > in and fix that: > - patch the specfile of the package in question > - do a local build > - add it to a local repo > - do a compose with the local repo included > > I wonder what the size will look like with all kde stuff removed. > > If you have any trouble with removing the kde dep (once you've tracked down > the culprit package), let me know and I'll try to help. > > Regards, > > Hans Watch out for requirements that are provided by multiple things as well. policy kit agents are a likely source of trouble. When there are multiple providers, and we prefer one provider (say the gnome/gtk provider rather than the KDE version) it's in our best interest to explicitly list the gnome/gtk provider in our package set so that yum will find a provider already in the transaction set and not seek out another. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list