Re: [master] memory: decrease the GUI limits a bit.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 17 May 2010 03:42:04 am Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> On 05/14/2010 04:25 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Ales Kozumplik (akozumpl@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
> >> diff --git a/isys/isys.h b/isys/isys.h
> >> index e3cb1fc..811b51b 100644
> >> --- a/isys/isys.h
> >> +++ b/isys/isys.h
> >> @@ -21,8 +21,9 @@
> >> 
> >>   #define H_ISYS
> >>   
> >>   #define MIN_RAM			262144 // 256 MB
> >> 
> >> -#define MIN_GUI_RAM		524288 // 512 MB
> >> +#define GUI_INSTALL_EXTRA_RAM   131072 // 128 MB
> >> 
> >>   #define URL_INSTALL_EXTRA_RAM   131072 // 128 MB
> >> 
> >> +#define MIN_GUI_RAM		MIN_RAM + GUI_INSTALL_EXTRA_RAM
> >> 
> >>   #define EARLY_SWAP_RAM		524288
> > 
> > What evidence is there that this is enough?
> > 
> > Bill
> 
> Good question! Simple answer: I tried and it is enough (more precisely:
> I tried a GUI installation, over nfs, with LVM+encryption, on a 384 MB
> virtual memory machine and got over the "Finding storage devices" step,
> that's the most critical, because GUI is already up and we make the LVM
> calls there)
> 
> More elaboratively: I had to increase the MIN_RAM couple weeks ago, see
> fbe24fe21350eec043d3f8ad41c1908b0878114a on master (there's also a
> similar patch for rhel6). The commit message shows some numbers too, but
> all of that was only tested during text install. It's very difficult to
> find out exactly how much X+metacity+gtk+other-desktop-crap will take
> together. I assumed I'd keep that at 256 MB extra, but then Hans
> complained he can install over http with GUI on 512 MB. So you will
> notice that while I increased the MIN_RAM by 128 MB I am decreasing the
> MIN_GUI_RAM by 128 MB now. This makes some sense: we are now running
> network manager (and who knows what else) in both text and gui install
> and that might use dynamic libraries that are later reused by the gui
> components (while earlier those were only loaded when X/gtk started).
> 
> That's my theory anyways but my experience seems to support it.
> 
> Ales

Not that it matters much i guess but doing a install on a sparc64 system with 
384MB ram unless using a plan text install with the minimal package set i 
always  get the install failing with OOM errors. as soon as i use vnc  even 
with a minimal package set install fails


Dennis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux