Re: [PATCH rhel6-branch] Unify two wait*() paths, so we only have two, not three... (#579044)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> The answer to "using waitpid() with a specific pid leads to zombies" is
> not "add a signal handler". With this patch, handle all pids in the
> udevd-starting loop, but only do the udevd stuff if the pid we get
> back is that of the the udevd process.

Looks good to me, as far as I can tell.  There's no initSigChildHandler
on f13-branch or master, but the waitpid->wait parts can definitely get
applied.

I have a second patch that'll add a bunch of printing here for the
future.  Once you commit this and I commit that, I'll do a rhel6 build.

- Chris

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux