On 04/06/2010 12:29 PM, David Lehman wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 10:58 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
>> On 04/06/2010 06:06 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> That won't work, as there actually are no duplicate VG's when looking only
>>> at the devices the user selected in the filter UI, the problem is
>>> that lvm at this point does not honor what we've selected in the filter UI
>>> and what not. Which is caused by the way we build the ignore these devices
>>> cmdline argument for lvm.
>>
>> Perhaps we should be generating an lvm.conf with a proper filter section for
>> this instead? It's not really an ideal solution :/
>
> It might be worth passing lvm a full list of the devices it is allowed
> to look at instead of telling it which devices to ignore. We will know
> the full list of PVs at activation time. I've considered this on several
> occasions since initially writing this stuff, but never tried it. Maybe
> that's what you meant anyway.
Yeah, that's basically what I was getting at.
--
Peter
Sanity's just a one trick pony anyway. You only get one trick -- rational
thinking -- but when you're good and crazy, the sky's the limit!
-- The Tick
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
