Re: branching for future fedora releases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 17:57 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 17:16 -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> > If only one is ever active, why have a different branch for it?
> 
> I think he means only one of 13-alpha or 13-beta branches would be
> active.  the f13-branch would remain active throughout the entire f13
> release cycle.  The -alpha and -beta branches would be short lived to
> provide an even more strict gate upon what changes go into the anaconda
> builds during that critical time.  Once the -alpha is marked as GOLD,
> the branch would no longer be used.

Exactly.

> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list


_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux