Re: branching for future fedora releases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/02/2010 03:29 PM, David Lehman wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 17:49 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:

> master
>  |- f13-branch
>  |   |- f13-alpha
>  |   \- f13-beta
>  \- rhel6-branch
>      |- rhel6-beta1
>      |- rhel6-beta2
>      \- rhel6-rc1
> 
> Yeah, it's a lot of branches, but only one alpha/beta/rc branch will
> ever be active for a given product/release.

If only one is ever active, why have a different branch for it?

>> Your thoughts?
>>
>> - Chris

I like it.

- -- 
Brian C. Lane <bcl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Red Hat / Port Orchard, WA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBS424ihF+jBaO/jp/AQIsowf9GfzHo332px5amflEQLTGJ4z1ay+FYMsp
/I53Mj/sLRb9TYWawBF8+EckCAfVXUKp+nHQ2yGfYnyJTkzwE6HfFPybY6VFUUR1
L5hA1SNLdHzM/mKiTjInnKG9LQUH3rQDsqduh2YBbP17W1xV/wC9jIWCbyp2keTh
5pYOchcLYFGE0adsw5Hasq+nmD9Cd40/iCduBiEyuRdFG9xJ3vQBZ1zqT7mOm2qh
8q+M8vG02+WcbPAe/SveJ7CFHitcjHvEp+FGkYF57HUYWNwHNKcfPQYcZ6RcrH0N
/3mAhYM11EpTn5nNO7EeHXBBx5hAR0Kxbxs43mbMgsMscr/+7IQW4Q==
=gKFH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux