Re: [PATCH 6/7] Use the updated DriverDisc code in loader

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yep having a set of flags in the . files on the media was what I have proposed ages ago. But we never got to make the decision, mainly because of rhel backward compatibility rules.

Martin

----- "Chris Lumens" <clumens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > I can't think of a better way to do this in the loader,
> unfortunately.
> > > We're making things harder on redistributers like Centos.  There,
> it's
> > > going to be disabled by default whereas on RHEL, it'll be enabled
> by
> > > default.  So, derived distributions will function differently than
> the
> > > original.
> > > 
> > > Still, I can't think of a better way.
> > 
> > I can think of another way - but we might want to discuss it with
> rel-eng,
> > because it'd require compose tools to change.
> > 
> > Basically, we could add a line to .buildstamp that behaves kindof
> like the "flags"
> > line in /proc/cpuinfo , ie something like "features: automoddisk"
> or
> > "features: noautomoddisk" to turn defaults for flags on and off at
> /compose/ time.
> > Then we'd process that line in loader between our built-in defaults
> and the
> > command line parsing.
> 
> This is a really interesting idea.  It makes a lot of sense to
> involve
> the compose tools because it's a list of features that the
> distribution
> supports, and it gets anaconda slightly more untied from a specific
> version or even distribution.
> 
> As we mentioned in person, pykickstart's going to have to be involved
> because the compose tools use it, but I don't think that's too much
> trouble.  anaconda can ignore the command(s) to set this stuff up. 
> That
> part should be really quite simple.
> 
> Incidentally, I still hate the .buildstamp lack-of-format.  We've got
> glib and it has a .ini-style config parser.  I'd like to be able to
> move
> to a format with more structure.  .treeinfo is already like this but
> in
> stage2.
> 
> > It's probably best to work on that as a separate feature independent
> of this.
> 
> Yeah, absolutely.
> 
> - Chris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux