Hi, > I don't see a single instance on this whole subject when you've > posted > without getting a response for more than a week. In most cases it's > been within a day. I know that review can be a difficult process, > especially with such a large chunk of code, but hyperbole really is > not helping here. Then look at the first set of task based patches. I got review within a day.. on one of them. The rest was laying there for another week. But this is a general problem with all patches touching pieces people do not like (and not just mine...). > > > Talking about libarchive, their documentation is a mess and could > use > > some help too (I wasn't just complaining, I actually looked at it > and > > I like the concept, but I have to figure out the small details > > first...) > > The API is not very hard to figure out from the headers; I wrote a > test > app at FudCon using it in 10 or 15 minutes. It wasn't that hard, I was just talking about the documentation. When I figured out that they work only with stream archives and let you read header, data, header, data.. it was easy. But that took a moment of thinking. Anyway, compilable version with libarchive is in the list now. Martin _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
