On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 14:14 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote: > > Me too... and also on the question of possibly including updates.img > > on the driver disc. > > Ugh, do we have to? And if so, how automatic is it supposed to be? You > can already specify an updates image location via updates= or via a > kickstart command. We also automatically look for one in various > locations relative to the stage2 image location. If we are > automatically looking in a driver disk, it seems like we're really > overloading the driver disk concept in a way that doesn't really make > sense. After all, what do updates to whatever tree you're installing > and a driver disk have in common? We really want to be able to have a single disk that updates drivers and supplies any corresponding fixes to the installer, combined with the fact that a single disk beats having to find several pieces. But it's not a huge deal for RHEL6. Jon. _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
