Re: PATCH fix 510970, 529551, 530541

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> If it does then we are currently
> not doing what Chris thinks we are doing.

You know, maybe one day someone will believe I actually know what I'm
doing.  I guess we're not there quite yet.

> So for this part of your patchset
> it would be good to find out where and when exactly /boot/upgrades is getting
> cleared with the current code, and if that is too late, move the clearing, instead
> of adding pretty much the same clearing code a second time.

anaconda does not remove /boot/upgrade (no 's') at any time.  However if
you look at the discussion we were just having, you will see that you
wrote:

> Thanks for also reviewing this, the second (third) pair of eyes is
> appreciated. I do have one question though. The first patch of the
> latest sets removes /boot/upgrade/install.img, which is a good thing
> to do as that frees precious /boot place before starting the upgrade,
> but if we do that why not just completely rm -fr /boot/upgrades ?

My reply was that implementing your suggestion to completely remove
/boot/upgrade was a bad idea.  I have no idea how you guys got started
thinking that I was saying we already do this.

- Chris

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux