So why not just help fix the bug now in libgudev rather than spend time on an interim thing that's going to be pulled out in the order of weeks to months? - Jeremy On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Martin Gracik <mgracik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Also, there's the libgudev, which does dynamic python bindings, > but because of a bug in PyGObject, does not work 100%, but that should be fixed > with the patches for F13, so this pyudev is a temporary solution only. > I think we will use the libgudev, when it will be ready. > > -- > > Martin Gracik > > ----- "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 11/11/2009 05:34 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> > Martin Gracik (mgracik@xxxxxxxxxx) said: >> >> Also rewrote the baseudev.py to use the bindings instead of >> parsing >> >> the udev db file >> > >> > Any reason pyudev can't be pushed upstream to udev? >> > >> >> Its not really a proper library binding, it uses ctypes, so you >> manually >> have to free memory in python when you are done with it, also >> it does not cover the full libudev API, just what we need. >> >> Regards, >> >> Hans >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list >> Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list > > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list > _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
