Ok, so then I can remove the whole method, and we have no problem with the naming :) -- Martin Gracik ----- "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/11/2009 09:24 AM, Martin Gracik wrote: > > Hello, > > > >> Can we instead only call pyudev.Udev() once and stash an instance > to > >> the > >> object as a global in baseudev.py? I'm concerned that we're going > to > >> be > >> introducing another big slowdown here in device discovery on very > >> large > >> configurations. > > > > Propably you're right, I have no idea how many times this get's > called. > > What I wanted to do first was rewrite the whole baseudev.py to > something "better". > > But Hans stopped me, to rewrite just needed parts, not to break > anything. > > So I was just trying to make as little changes as possible to the > original code. > > > > My concern is, where will we call the "teardown" method? > > > > We would not, we would do one call to libudev_new_udev on import of > pyudev.py, > and then never release it, its memory will then get returned to the > OS > when python exits. > > Regards, > > Hans > > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
