On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 13:24 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Peter Jones (pjones@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Okay, and now for the conversation about this. > > > > I think betanag should be set in a different package, such as fedora-release. > > The process that failed here is that it's anaconda's responsibility to change > > this right now, but not our decision to decide when it should be changed. It > > clearly belongs outside of anaconda, just like the yum repo files, release > > notes, gpg keys, splash images, etc. > > ... should it even be *in* a package, as opposed to part of a buildstamp, > or whatever? > We were discussing this on IRC, and we all think that .treeinfo is probably the best place to store/fetch that information, and some investigation needs to be done to figure out which producer of .treeinfo has the best knowledge at compose time to indicate nag or not. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
