OK, we have a bug number now :) #533874 ----- "Jeremy Katz" <katzj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Martin Sivak <msivak@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I did talk to blkid maintainer. They are not fixing the API in > RHEL5. We may get what we need for RHEL6 though. > > "may" doesn't mean will :-) Unless there's some sort of commitment > for the API upstream, then we really should avoid hacking it in for > RHEL5 because we'll end up needing to do the same sort of thing for > the future and then we'll have widely divergent code. > > - Jeremy > > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
