> I think you'll have problems with 51 or 64 GB disks. You don't want a > /home that is only 1 GB or 14 GB. It might make sense to do this > instead: > > VG < 50 GB: make /boot, swap, rest as / > 100 GB >= VG >= 50GB: make /boot, swap, split rest between / and /home > VG > 100 GB: make /boot, swap, / with 50 GB max, rest as /home > > That keeps /home from being too small in the separate /home case. The > smallest a separate /home could be is 25.5 or 26 GB. I don't believe we have the ability to express sizes of requests this complex, even after the thing I added in this patch. I also think this is a fairly difficult change to make - at least in a clean and generic way. We have the ability to do 50/50 splits by giving the requests the same minimum size. And we have the ability to cap requests out at some maximum size. And with my patch we can give requests a minimum size that must exist for the request to even be used. But, I don't think we can combine those together to cover the 50 <= size <= 100 case. Anyway, do you think that really matters? How many users are going to fall into the 51 GB or 64 GB cases here? See my other mail where I said that we don't even spend this much effort making sure / is a minimum useful size. - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
