Re: [f12, master] Use a "change" event instead of "add" to populate udev db

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 21:16 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 10/29/2009 08:29 PM, David Lehman wrote:
> > For F12, these go in just as they are. For rawhide, I want to remove the
> > attr_nomatch keyword argument from baseudev.udev_trigger and change the
> > udev_trigger calls to instead specify a "change" event, effectively
> > making master look like f12 after these patches.
> >
> 
> Both patches look ok, but I wonder if this change wont cause any
> unpleasant new issues so late in the F-12 cycle.

Well, it's intended to fix an unpleasant new issue ;)

I worried about it a little at first, but no more. It's probably more
correct anyhow, and I don't think many, if any, of the rules we care
about make any distinction between add/change (except, of course, the
device-mapper rules).

James Laska tested the patch on a live install and I tested it in a qemu
non-live install. Both installs behaved normally.

Dave




> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux