-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 10/21/2009 02:52 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
We have a rhel6-branch, so vacuum up things from RHEL-6 dist-cvs and put
them in git.
Wasn't the plan to make sure anything committed to the RHEL-6 branch also
went to the master branch and in time retire the RHEL-6 branch and make a
new RHEL-6 branch out of the master one ?
In that case it seems like a good idea keep the RHEL specific bits in
dist-cvs for now until we really do a final RHEL-6 branch (based on
master with all the UI changes bits, proxy support, etc. in).
The fact that RHEL-6 changes exist in dist-cvs is unacceptable, IMHO. We
should be doing everything in git for anaconda because tracking things from
two version control systems is stupid.
Since we have a rhel6-branch, I think we should inherit the changes from
dist-cvs so that the rhel6-branch in git reflects what is going in to the
RHEL-6 builds now.
- --
David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Red Hat / Honolulu, HI
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkrfdCMACgkQ5hsjjIy1VklyeACgw6ZvicNrlzrnu+KPDf6MAwbk
FDQAn0I1a9kyFpTTn2rdOvI6C5BL0lGw
=JabU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
