> Aside from what notting already said, I'm not opposed to implementing > something like this, but what I'd like to see is the definition of 'minimal' > coming from something else mostly so we have an answer to the "please include > ____ in minimal" bugs. > > Perhaps the definition of minimal should come from FESCo. I don't think we > should be in the business of defining and implementing this, just implementing > it. What I'm really doing here isn't so much defining what a minimal install is, but what a non-minimal useful desktop install is. A minimal install under this code is going to be the same as what we've defined it to be under a text install where you don't get a choice about packaging - just core. I'm okay with that. However, I do agree with the sentiment regarding what groups I'm selecting by default for the useful desktop install. - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
