On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 13:30 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > We were adding mdraid container members (raidsets inside the container) > to the device tree as DiskDevices. Which works, but is not completely > correct. This patch introduce a PartitionableMDRaidArrayDevice and > uses that for mdraid container members instead. This means we now also > correctly tear them down / set them up when asked. In the future (mostly > needs UI work to export the functionality) PartitionableMDRaidArrayDevice > can be used to create partitionable normal (native metadata) mdraid sets too. Even though I think this is the wrong approach in the long term, it does follow what we do now in general. So, for F12, this approach makes sense. When we decide to support whole-disk formats other than disklabels we will need to overhaul all of these classes, and the addition of PartitionableMDRaidArray doesn't add a significant amount to that workload. Ship it, I guess. Dave _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
