On Monday 14 September 2009 08:02:53 am Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > ---
> > scripts/buildinstall | 3 ++-
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/buildinstall b/scripts/buildinstall
> > index 34f5904..e5aa81e 100755
> > --- a/scripts/buildinstall
> > +++ b/scripts/buildinstall
> > @@ -191,9 +191,10 @@ if [ "$LOCALSCRIPTS" = "yes" ]; then
> > else
> > pushd $BUILDINSTDIR
> > BUILDARCH=`repoquery -c $yumconf --qf "%{ARCH}\n" anaconda`
> > - # This is a crappy implementation but x86 is the only place we
> > currently see + # This is a crappy implementation but x86 and sparc
> > are the only places we currently see it # BUILDARCH != BASEARCH (e.g.
> > i586 != i386) so it'll suffice. BASEARCH=`echo $BUILDARCH | sed -e
> > 's/i.86/i386/'`
> > + BASEARCH=`echo $BUILDARCH | sed -e 's/sparcv9/sparc/'`
> > yumdownloader -c $yumconf anaconda || exit 1
> > rpm2cpio anaconda*rpm | cpio --quiet -iumd './usr*'
> > rm -f anaconda*rpm
>
> Is the above RUN on the arch in question?
>
> b/c you could do:
>
> python -c "import rpmUtils.arch; \
> print rpmUtils.arch.getCanonArch(skipRpmPlatform = True)"
>
It is
on sparc i get sparc64v out and not sparc we need to run as a 64 bit process
to make sure we install our kernel but the canonical arch should be sparc i
suspect ppc would be the same.
Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
