On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 19:38 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 09/09/2009 05:14 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Hans de Goede (hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > >> We're moving back to %post generation of dracut initrd's due to > >> GPL concerns about shipping pre build initrd's. This means the initrd > >> will no longer be truely generic. To reflect this and make clear it is > >> not an mkinitrd initrd, the name was changes to simply dracut.img. > > > > Even with regeneration in %post, it can still be generic, yes? > > > > Yes and it will be, but dracut was split in dracut and dracut-network, > and the normal generated initrd will be able to boot anything except > for things like iscsi FCoE or / on nfs, that requires having dracut-network > installed when the initrd is generated, so it is less generic then it > was, but still may more generic then mkinitrd generated initrd's > (this saves dragging in quite a few deps, as we now need dracut > runtime, and also is a nice safe on the initrd image size) We still get two images generated, right? Or is it now just one larger initrd that is also "generic"? Jon. _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
