On Friday, August 14 2009, Chris Lumens said: > > On Monday, August 03 2009, Chris Lumens said: > > > + for dev in filter(lambda d: d.type <= parted.DEVICE_SX8, parted.getAllDevices()): > > > > This line feels a little bit fragile -- what happens when parted adds a > > new device type? > > We're screwed. > > The reason for this lame hack is that parted.DEVICE_DM is not compiled > in, and yet some devices are still reporting the constant. It was > either the above or hardcode the value of DEVICE_DM. Maybe we should fix parted then :-) Or maybe we could kludge something with our udev code. I'll look a little closer when I'm through my millions and millions of emails Jeremy _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
