On Thursday 13 August 2009 12:57:28 pm Chris Lumens wrote: > With the exception of the two comments I mailed off, these look fine to > me. I am a little surprised that neither booty/ nor platform.py needs > any changes, though. > sparc was already in booty/ and platform.py sparc support had been partially removed over the years but not fully. Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
