On Tuesday, July 28 2009, Bill Nottingham said: > Jeremy Katz (katzj@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > On Tuesday, July 28 2009, Bill Nottingham said: > > > Jeremy Katz (katzj@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > > system-config-keyboard has the keyboard bits now, so let's use > > > > those rather than the ones from rhpl > > > > > > What if we want to kill system-config-keyboard? It doesn't really > > > serve a purpose outside from setting the initial system config. > > > (See also: language, rootpassword, etc.) > > > > It's also used in firstboot. And we're already using the *widgets* from > > system-config-keyboard, so using the model lists from there too is > > entirely reasonable... > > Maybe the answer is just to depackage the standalone tools. (as opposed > to the widgetry/firstboot bits) We probably really need to see how we can use the (now existing, though desktop enviroment specific) tools/frontends at install time rather than having our own slightly different UI. But non-trivial to do as embeddability isn't necessarily their raison d'être unlike the s-c bits where we built them that way to begin with (largely by starting with what had been in anaconda and pulling it out to be separate). As Chris said on IRC -- around and around and around it goes.... Jeremy _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
