On Friday, July 10 2009, Alford, Seth said: > We had to modify mknod-stub.patch. As I recall, it was somehow > getting called twice. That led it to complain that the device > node already existed. The patch silences the complaint, but only > for the case where the node already exists, with the right major > and minor numbers, device type (character or block,) and modes. > Otherwise, mknod-stub will still complain. It's probably worth fixing whatever the caller is to only call once -- we don't use the stub anymore, using regular mknod instead and I'm pretty sure regular mknod will complain if you try to recreate an existing device node in a similar fashion Jeremy _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
