On Thursday, June 18 2009, Radek Vykydal said: > Jeremy Katz wrote: >> While this looks like it'll work, it also looks like it might be a >> little fragile. I wonder if it's worth trying to get a better API in >> place that we could use to pass what we want to set. Alternately, we >> could just not use the base class's logging setup at all and do it all >> ourselves >> > > You are right, there is not much gain in calling base class's logging > setup, I am sending new version of patch that doesn't do it. As for > better API, maybe addition of optional logging configuration files to > yum (for yum and yum.verbose loggers) could be worthy, but I don't feel > like diving into it right now. Cool, this looks okay Jeremy _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
