> >> Rather than yet another command line parameter, I wonder if we'd be > >> better off to just backoff and try a second and third time. How long is > >> typically being needed to sleep and wait? > > > > That's a possibility, too. Typically it's less than 20 seconds needed > > to sleep, sometimes as short as 3 seconds. So maybe try sleeping for 10 > > seconds before the 2nd attempt, and another 20 before the 3rd? > > Could even do 5-10 tries over 30 seconds and if we don't succeed in that > long, then fail. That would save people from having to pass an obscure > parameter and make things just work for them We could even treat this like TCP and do the exponential backoff. I'd be fine with a patch that does that. Could we also get one in Fedora, if appropriate there too? - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
