Noticed that ext4 filesystems were presenting users with a 'migrate to'
combo box with 'ext4' as the only entry. Tracked down the problem to
the migratable property override in Ext3FS. Changed it around to use
helper functions with property() and the UI is working more sanely now.
Users cannot select ext4 as the migration target for ext4.
---
storage/formats/fs.py | 10 +++++-----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/storage/formats/fs.py b/storage/formats/fs.py
index 6330825..d784341 100644
--- a/storage/formats/fs.py
+++ b/storage/formats/fs.py
@@ -679,8 +679,7 @@ class FS(DeviceFormat):
options = property(_getOptions, _setOptions)
- @property
- def migratable(self):
+ def _isMigratable(self):
""" Can filesystems of this type be migrated? """
return bool(self._migratable and self.migratefsProg and
filter(lambda d: os.access("%s/%s"
@@ -689,6 +688,8 @@ class FS(DeviceFormat):
os.environ["PATH"].split(":")) and
self.migrationTarget)
+ migratable = property(_isMigratable)
+
def _setMigrate(self, migrate):
if not migrate:
self._migrate = migrate
@@ -874,11 +875,10 @@ class Ext3FS(Ext2FS):
return size
- @property
- def migratable(self):
+ def _isMigratable(self):
""" Can filesystems of this type be migrated? """
return (flags.cmdline.has_key("ext4migrate") and
- Ext2FS.migratable)
+ Ext2FS._isMigratable(self))
register_device_format(Ext3FS)
--
1.6.2.2
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
