Hello, has this trivial patch maybe been overseen? It's relevant to RHEL-5. <https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2009-April/msg00671.html> Thanks, Niels Niels de Vos wrote: > If the user requested text-mode or cmdline-mode it is not needed > to display a message about missing X (minstg2.img) or too little > memory. > > Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <niels.devos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > This patch is against rhel5-base and tested with SRPM of > anaconda-11.1.2.168-1.el5. > > anaconda | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/anaconda b/anaconda > index 58f3865..4ccc9a1 100755 > --- a/anaconda > +++ b/anaconda > @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ def checkMemory(opts): > > # override display mode if machine cannot nicely run X > if not flags.test: > - if iutil.memInstalled() < isys.MIN_GUI_RAM: > + if opts.display_mode == 'g' and iutil.memInstalled() < isys.MIN_GUI_RAM: > stdoutLog.warning(_("You do not have enough RAM to use the graphical " > "installer. Starting text mode.")) > opts.display_mode = 't' > @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ if __name__ == "__main__": > # now determine if we're going to run in GUI or TUI mode > # > # if no X server, we have to use text mode > - if not (flags.test or flags.rootpath) and (rhpl.getArch() != "s390" and not os.access("/mnt/runtime/usr/bin/Xorg", os.X_OK)): > + if opts.display_mode == 'g' and not (flags.test or flags.rootpath) and (rhpl.getArch() != "s390" and not os.access("/mnt/runtime/usr/bin/Xorg", os.X_OK)): > stdoutLog.warning(_("Graphical installation not available... " > "Starting text mode.")) > time.sleep(2)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
