> The hunks starting at 586 and 702 don't look like they should be there, > but the rest of it looks fine. Yeah, those were unintentional changes based on me moving this patch from one branch to another. I've taken care to only push the relevant parts, though. Thanks for noticing. - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
