Looks ok,
Regards,
Hans
On 04/21/2009 01:17 AM, David Lehman wrote:
mdadm's assemble and incremental modes for assembling existing arrays
are mutually exclusive. According to dledford, we must use one or the
other -- not a mixture. We will use incremental assembly during device
tree population and then use the assemble command to activate the arrays
once they are fully defined.
---
storage/devicetree.py | 9 ++-------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/storage/devicetree.py b/storage/devicetree.py
index c52184d..13dd0fb 100644
--- a/storage/devicetree.py
+++ b/storage/devicetree.py
@@ -1328,13 +1328,8 @@ class DeviceTree(object):
memberDevices=md_devices,
uuid=md_uuid,
sysfsPath=sysfs_path,
- exists=True,
- parents=[device])
- try:
- md_array.setup()
- except (DeviceError, MDRaidError) as e:
- log.info("setup of md array %s failed: %s"
- % (md_array.name, e))
+ exists=True)
+ md_array._addDevice(device)
self._addDevice(md_array)
def handleUdevDMRaidMemberFormat(self, info, device):
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
